Sheila G Interpretation and direct quotes:
I have been doing a lot of research lately on leftist organizations and how they may be impacting conservatives. In the early stages of my research I really thought that the United Nations and George Soros were behind much of the action against conservatives. My recent research has resulted in me modifying my thinking somewhat. I still think the United Nations plays a part but not as much as I thought. It has solidified my findings that George Soros plays an integral part. What is newly added to my findings is the role that plutocrats – rich people who believe they should govern America – play in this scheme. In fact, my opinion is that really is who our war is with. I have written a lot about the corrupt American globalist think tank named the Atlantic Council. I still firmly believe they are the strategists, the developers, and the implementors of much of what we see today. I still believe this think tank needs to be shut down as well as forced to repay the millions of taxpayer dollars that our government made in the way of donations to this corrupt organization. Then yesterday, 12/19/2019 my copy of Issue 7, 2019 of Capital Research arrived. (I love this publication as much as I love my Judicial Watch publications. And, I do not get paid to promote either one.) This issue contains a special report by David Hogberg entitled “The Left’s Next Culture War: Taking Over Corporations One Board Room at a Time". David has written a number of wonderful special reports which I recommend everyone to read. David’s article makes my opinion that plutocrats are behind the movement against conservatives even stronger – really strong. Justin Danhof, the Director of the Free Enterprise Project at the National Center for Public Policy Research wrote the forward for David’s article. Justin’s forward grabbed my attention right away: “The political left has had increasing success over the last decade compelling corporate America to actively support liberal positions on political, economic and social issues. [Read this sentence again – it is imperative you remember this.] Going under the saccharine heading “Corporate Social Responsibility” [remember this term also], this leftist campaign has succeeded in getting more of their own hired as CEOs, on the boards of directors, and the C suite. In recent years the campaign has persuaded many large companies to dissect themselves from the National Rifle Association and to cheerlead for the LGBTQ agenda.” As a business owner I have always thought it was a very bad move for any business to make public their political stance. My employees and customers could not tell you my political preference and I could not tell you theirs. It’s an off limits topic at my company. Why would I want to chance alienating otherwise wonderful employees and valued customers with my political beliefs? The fact is I can’t afford to do that. Moving on to the issue - I haven’t invested in mutual funds in years. The reason is that I don’t want to give the fund manager my voting rights. My decision to vote my own proxies has nothing to do with what David revealed. I certainly didn’t know any of what he enlightened me about. So, I purchase stock not mutual funds. I have always thought as a stockholder the company’s leadership team, general councils and board members have a fiduciary (legal) responsibility to protect my investment. However, after reading this I clearly understand that companies have replaced this fiduciary responsibility with “Corporate Social Responsibility”. At the present time, I still believe their fiduciary responsibility to protect my investment is the law on the books. It may take a lawsuit or two to make this clear to companies who exercise Corporate Social Responsibility over the rule of law. So, standby Jack (of Twitter) – I am coming for you! David Hogberg does a marvelous job of explaining and exposing how companies are doing this. It is something that we all need to understand – whether you invest or not. This is a significant piece of the war we are fighting. We are being duped by big money investors. But how? (Within the next 30 days his article should be available on the Capital Research link I provided. You must read the article – it’s very, very well written.) Here, I give you my take-aways from David’s article.
But how? The process begins with proxy services providers. When you invest in mutual funds you give away your right to vote on proxy statements to the mutual fund manager. The mutual fund manager gives his/her right to vote on your behalf to proxy service providers. The reason mutual fund managers do this is that they would have to vote thousands of proxy statements yearly. They still have to sign off on the recommendation of the proxy service provider. Unless they go through and evaluate every recommendation, it is pretty much a rubber stamp. The proxy service provider determines how to vote on shareholder proposals. Ahh! but they also determine on behalf of the corporation what the issue will be on the ballot and what the outcome will be using ESG criteria. Fact: There are two proxy service providers that control 97 percent of the proxy advisory services market in the U.S. and they both support liberal shareholder activists. Their shareholder proposals on average get 24% of the vote. Proposals that receive a single digit percent of the vote generally don’t receive much attention. But when double digits prevail it is going to get the attention of the board. For those of you who have voted on a proxy statement, do you remember seeing a statement that says something like, “this option is the recommended option”? You can pretty much take it to the bank that recommendation was determined by a proxy service provider. Fact: Proxy service provider number one is Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) who support liberal shareholder activists. Fact: Proxy service provider number two is Glass Lewis which is owned by Canadian pension funds. It too supports liberal shareholder activists. One example David's article gives is an Amazon proxy statement. The proxy statement mandated that for every open board seat, you must interview a woman and an underrepresented minority. This was pushed by the SEIU and a broad group of liberal interest groups. Amazon opposed it for 6 weeks and liberal media was pounding away at them. They gave in because ISS not only recommended to their clients to vote for the proposal (which are usually secret) but they came out publicly in favor of the proposal. This is an example of one of the richest companies in the world who couldn’t stand up to ISS, which is THAT powerful. To summarize: If you have a corporate 401K you probably are invested mutual funds. I don’t pretend to know what if anything you can do about that. If you have private investments, you may be going through a broker who puts you into mutual funds. Again, I can’t provide you with anything to do about that. But I can tell you there is more. I will do so here. Why did one of the world’s richest companies cave? There is a not so well known rating system that the left uses against companies. ISS has an entire rating system that it uses. Yes, it is a conflict on interest; They rate the companies to whom they are giving proposal advice. David Hogberg article says,” …there are dozens of rating systems on the Left, that rate every ESG and CSR issue… One of the most influential is the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index. The Human Rights Campaign is a single-issue group on the LGBTQ promotions. In my opinion they are fully anti-religion and anti-life and it’s about 17 years old. Each year the Human Rights campaign sends out a questionnaire like most of these indexes do each year…. CEOs brag about their rating on the HRC index. It will be in their promo material. The HRC, of course, knows this. Every single year the HRC tweaks the index, so it acts as both the carrot and the stick. A few years ago they tweaked it so that a corporation must have an outward facing event – something like an advertisement – every year that promotes the LGBTQ community. Last year they tweaked it so that you must have three outward facing events to keep your perfect score.” What gives the lowest HRC score? Donating to a conservative group such as the Alliance Defending Freedom, or the Heritage Foundation, or the Family Research Council will earn you the lowest possible score. Google “Human Rights Campaign” and “Corporate Sponsors” to see the companies rated by them also fund ISS because that counts as a checklist item. How has corporate activism impacted gun rights? There is a large group of activists implementing a coordinated campaign to change the culture on guns issues without changing the laws. They use corporate America very successfully to do this. They file shareholder resolutions and attend shareholder meetings. They also run various media campaigns such as “#BoycottNRA on social media. Remember when Bank of America said it will no longer lend money to certain gun manufacturers that make assault style rifles? The strategy is to squeeze guns out of retail space, and limit gun manufacturers from getting funding from banks. Then, you effectively change the 2nd amendment without any legislation. And, his recommendation for combating the Left for anyone who wants to get corporations out of politics: “Get engaged. Become a stakeholder. Businesses have signaled that they are beholden to stakeholders. If you want to have an impact, to affect change at the corporate level, then you need to engage corporations in the same way the left does. What you don’t want to do is disengage. There is a big desire among conservatives to boycott a company when it is doing something we don’t like. For example, conservatives called for a boycott of Nike because it hired Colin Kaepernick. The left does it the opposite way. When a company does something they don’t like, they engage more with that company. So my advice to conservatives is don’t divest, don’t boycott because it will not have the desired effect. Engagement is the way to go.” Conservative entrepreneurs are you interested? There is so much more in David Hogberg’s article. Hopefully, I have covered enough to whet your appetite.
0 Comments
The Form had a Revision Date of AUG/2019 When ICIG Atkinson first said the "whistleblower's" form was changed between May 2018 and Aug 2019 but couldn’t remember when, we cried, "BS!" Now, he admits he changed the form in Sep 2019 and back dated it to Aug/2019. He hasn’t answered why he did that.
This leads to the following suppositions/possibilities: 1) Is the "whistleblower" pretty high up? In the CIA? 2) Was is done to accommodate the "whistleblower"? Or timing for political theater? 3) Is it further evidence that this whole ordeal from start to finish is a CIA-DNC-Clinton-Ukraine coup attempt. There are some who say arrest Pelosi, Schiff, ICIG Atkinson, Romney, Black, Biden and his kid, Comey, McCabe & John O Brennan and both "whistleblowers". The first person to roll gets the deal. Here's why, as beautifully laid out by Patriot Shiela G. Please stay with us, as this is long. (TheFederalist.com has a great article on the subject, as well.) This whole thing started in 2015. To summarize the situation: It is alleged that the CIA & DNC with Google's assistance planned, in a premeditated fashion, using corrupt Ukraine officials, corrupt Atlantic Council officials, and the Burisma company to create a "Russian narrative". Many don’t even believe the DNC computers were hacked. Remember, the DNC refused to give the servers to the FBI. It leads to the question as to whether players in the FBI were in on this coup attempt from the beginning. Google's Finger on the Scale Eric Schmidt, the billionaire chairman of Alphabet who owns Google, went to work on Clinton’s campaign. Apparently, he left Alphabet on 1/31/2018 but worked for the campaign beginning in 2015. In APR 2015 Stephanie Hannon, former Director of Google Product support left Alphabet to be Clinton’s chief technolgy officer for 2016. July 2015 Crowdstrike closes $100m financing deal with Google Capital known now as Capital IG. Between mid-2015 and late 2016 Clinton/DNC retained the law firm of Perkins Coie; in turn, one of its partners, Marc E. Elias, retained Fusion GPS. The amount paid to Fusion GPS is unknown. Clinton campaign and the DNC paid $9.1 million to Perkins Coie during this time. September 2015 - The FBI contacts the Democratic National Committee's help desk, cautioning the IT department that at least one computer has been compromised by Russian hackers. A technician scans the system and does not find anything suspicious. April 2016, in its capacity as attorney for the DNC, Perkins Coie – through another of its partners, Michael Sussman – is the law firm that retained CrowdStrike, the cyber security outfit, upon learning in April 2016 that the DNC’s servers had been hacked. On October 7, 2016, 30 minutes after THE Access Hollywood tape was first published, WikiLeaks began publishing thousands of emails from Podesta's Gmail account. Throughout October, WikiLeaks released installments of these emails on a daily basis. 2016- CrowdStrike was hired by the DNC through Perkins Coie to investigate the origins of the "hack". The company didn’t give the DNC’s physical servers or computers to the FBI, which has been seized on by conspiracy theorists as evidence of a cover up. (It’s no conspiracy.) CrowdStrike Connection CrowdStrike was founded by Dimitry Alperovitch, a UKRAINIAN oligarch & senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. Another owner and senior manager of CrowdStrike is a former Sr. FBI man Shawn Henry, who was promoted by ROBERT MUELLER to the Head of Cyber Security in the 2000s. CrowdStrike is allegedly FUNDED BY Google, the arms industry, NATO, the US Military, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and another Ukrainian oligarch who donated $10 million to the Clinton Foundation named VICTOR PINCHUK. Pinchuk is the founder of EastOne Group LLC, an international investing, project funding and financial advisory company based in London, as well as Interpipe Group, one of Ukraine's leading pipe, wheel and steel producers. Pinchuk is the owner of four TV channels and a popular tabloid, Fakty i Kommentarii. He was a member of the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, for two consecutive terms from 1998 to 2006. He is married to Olena Pinchuk, the daughter of FORMER UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT Leonid Kuchma. PINCHUK may be described as corrupt. The March 2019 Ukraine presidential election is a pivotal event in Ukraine’s history. Recognizing the high stakes, the Atlantic Council, the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, and the Transatlantic Commission on Election Integrity established the Ukrainian Election Task Force. This fact establishes that Alperovitch and Pinchuk know each other through the Atlantic Council. Remember, it was CrowdStrike that said it had been able to identify the Russian agents behind the DNC "hack" because it was already familiar with them and had turned everything over to the FBI. Pinchuk, who has given up to $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, appeared on the 2012 dinner guest list that was sent between Dennis Cheng, an executive at the foundation, and Huma Abedin, then Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the State Department. Abedin noted in a subsequent email that the gathering would be hosted in Clinton’s home. However, Hillary’s spokesman insisted in 2014 that the Pinchuk never crossed paths with Clinton while she served as secretary of state. To summarize: Alperovitch and Hillary are associated through the DNC/ CrowdStrike relationship. Alperovitch and Pinchuk are associated through Atlantic Council. Hillary and Pinchuk are associates through the State Dpt and the known dinner at her home. The the Atlantic Council–which is funded in part by the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk–has been among the loudest voices calling for a NEW Cold War with Russia. So why not blame Russia? Ukraine Election Influence on Biden and Schiff April 8,2019 Ukrainian officials say their efforts to deliver evidence of Democrat Party interference in the 2016 presidential election have been brushed off by the U.S. Department of Justice, a WorldTribune report said. The Ukrainians have sworn statements from two of their officials admitting their agency tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton.
Ukraine Connected to Pelosi's Son, too Pelosi has Ukrainian ties as well. Paul Pelosi Jr is member of a management team of Viscoil Group of Companies and NRGLab. Pelosi’s son traveled to Ukraine in 2017 on behalf of the Corporate Governance Initiative, where he serves as executive director --supposedly to talk about soccer. He recently appeared on Ukrainian television to talk about his business in the country. The video was recently changed to private. What is there to hide? Interestingly, another video indicates that Pelosi’s NRGLab did business in Ukraine. Walter Afanasieff, Brandon Stone, Mika Newton and other artists are actively involved in promoting the clean technology of Viscoil Group of Companies and NRGLab. For example, Mika Newton helped to secure the rights to build a plant for the production of SH-boxes in Ukraine. The introduction in the first video above is given by Nancy Pelosi, in which she touts Obama “elevating science to a higher place in our national priorities." It turns out Nancy Pelosi’s son, Paul, like Biden's son, Hunter, may also be getting jobs for which they have no obvious qualifications. The firm InfoUSA, headed by major Clinton backer Vinod Gupta, placed Pelosi’s son, Paul Pelosi Jr., on its payroll. It is alleged that InfoUSA repeatedly rented marketing databases to unscrupulous persons who used the information to defraud the unsuspecting elderly, investigators found. The company is also under fire in a shareholder lawsuit which alleges that Gupta is appropriating company funds for personal use and his political pet projects….Pelosi’s son Paul acknowledged he has also been taking trips on corporate jets provided by Info USA. This isn’t his first brush with scandal. Another happened when Nancy Pelosi was House Minority Leader. Paul Pelosi Jr. was president and chief operating officer of Natural Blue Resources Inc., an investment company he cofounded that focused on “environmentally-friendly” ventures. The SEC charged four individuals with fraud, including former New Mexico Gov. Toney Anaya, and suspended trading in the company’s stock. Pelosi owned over 10 million shares. The SEC said the company was “secretly controlled” by James E. Cohen and Joseph Corazzi, both of whom had previous fraud convictions. Corazzi violated federal E. Cohen and Joseph Corazzi, both of whom had previous fraud convictions. Corazzi violated federal securities laws and was barred from acting as an officer or director of a public company. Cohen was previously incarcerated for financial fraud. Nancy’s son came out untouched with no charges. Conclusion Taking the information from these multiple media sources outlined above, and then adding Glenn Beck’s video which discusses the internal purpose and players of Burisma and the Ukrainian interference with the 2016 election, one may walk away with these findings:
We have tried to educate the press and many others that "NATIONALIST" and "SUPREMACIST" are not interchangeable terms. And now the press is touting the monsters who did the El Paso and Ohio murderers as 'white nationalist terrorists". We are fed up with the term “nationalists” being used as if it were a dirty word.
Really, the name-calling really is for a far more sinister purpose. We are equally fed up placing the blame on someone other than the individual who perpetrated the act. I don't know about you, but my parents brought me up with the express knowledge that no one - no one - could ever make me do something which I did not want to do, without an imminent threat of death. My parents also made clear that while I would make some not so good decisions in my life, those decisions were mine. In addition, the expectation was for me to own those decisions as the rule. Look at the mass murders by shooting. There was probably some mental health issues. But was the shooter so mentally out there they did not know right from wrong? I may be wrong, but the way I see it they had the mental fortitude to plan it and execute it. If they had that fortitude they knew what they were doing was wrong. I do reserve the right to change my mind as more information becomes available. In the meanwhile, there is one thing I do know: It was not our President, or even the press, that pulled that trigger. I am more a apt to believing these shooters think of themselves as terrorists. A terrorist is an advocate or a practioner of terrorism as a means of coercion. The press, TV, radio, social media, and even our Congress will not denounce KNOWN terror organizations in the United States. They are practicing psyops methods to break us, wear us down, destroy our will, and to make us cave in despair. They want us to be fearful so in the end we are tired and surrender willingly. They play us. They attempt to divide us. We cannot give up. I will not give in to their ignorance nor give them their end game of achieving a socialist economy which will ultimately make us a communist country. Lists of terrorist organizations declared by the US Goverment https://www.state.gov/foreign-terrorist-organizations/ https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/the-terrorist-threat-confronting-the-united-states Consider this, from NBC World News: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/experts-warn-against-trump-designating-muslim-brotherhood-terrorist-organization-n1001051 What is psy-ops? It is demonstrated many times throughout the day, every day. "Psyops" is psychological operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences in order to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. The article above from NBC World News exemplifies this. George Soros has his finger in much of left's pie, seeminly at the control deck. His supportive agencies, organizations, and foundations extensively employ psyop methods. Soros and the United Nations uses psyops to induce or reinforce behavior favorable to their desired outcome which is to destroy our republic and make us ready for a NWO. Psyops can be used in both peacetime and warfare. There is white, gray, and black psyops. There is strategic, tactical, and operational psyops. Most psyops are carried out by governments. However, anyone can institute or engage in acts of psyops. The goal of any psyop is to encourage popular discontent with the opposition's leadership and by combining persuasion with a credible threat, degrade an adversary's ability to conduct or sustain operations - military or private coups. They can also disrupt, confuse, and protract the adversary's decision-making process undermining command and control. The press is a useful tool in this. Ideally, the process can save the lives of friendly or enemy forces by reducing the adversary's will to fight. By lowering the adversary's morale and then its efficiency, PSYOPS can also discourage aggressive actions by creating disaffection within the people with the ultimate goal of leading to surrender. NWO UN supporters want one world order, one world military, one world health system by year 2030. It is also called United Nations Agenda30. The 30 represents 2030. They were well on their way to achieving this by implementing the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) as the long arm of the UN in America. The CGI was the money laundry device engaging many wealthy and prominent people and large American corporations to participate in the money washing scheme. Many of our congressional members were CGI members along with many world leaders. Those pushing for a NWO such as Soros, the UN, Congresspersons, and other world leaders are the root of the psyops happening now. For the NWO to succeed, they need us to surrender and to become their servants before 2030. They will go to any lengths, employ any strategy, use any tactic to achieve their goals. They are desperate now. The CGI collapsed. BTW, you can look at the annual attendees at the annual CGI conference online if it hasn’t been scrubbed. (Ah, but I did save those attendance sheets. Let me assure you it is as interesting as Epstein’s little black book.) Research Soros Soros has established many different organizations within the United States to bring down our republic. These organizations even receive federal taxpayer money in the form of grants. Yes, our government is giving our money to organizations to bring our republic down. Stupid uh? Well, you can find these organizations on the Judicial Watch website. Here are some of the services they provide:
While money talks, it seems certain that specific people have been promised very desirable positions within the NWO. Controlling the Message Soros established Media Matters to control the message. The leaders of the tech giants and social media, along with msm media owners online, tv and news print must also have a secure place in the new world order because they are so willing to print hatred, engage in divisiveness, censorship and condemnation of conservative views. Furthest, they don’t care how they do it. However, for it to be completely successful they must disarm the American people. Leave us without a way to defend ourselves. Politicizing mass murders is a method, monetizing children to create political discord, polarizing the left and the right are all psyops. It is believed Soros indirectly funds ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter. It is only my opinion, and I have no proof but I wonder if the Portland, OR mayor Ted Wheeler, Rep Earl Blumenauer and Gov Kate Brown aren’t also paid indirectly by Soros to let ANTIFA rule the city and freely beat the hell out of Portland citizens. Doubt the UN's role in psyops? From Big League Politics: The United Nations just released a new and rambling plan to combat what the organization sees as “hate speech” on Saturday, August 3, 2019. A memo on the plan was signed off on by the organization’s secretary-general, Antonio Guterres. (Before this assignment, Guterres was the UN’s High Commissioner of Refugees.) The globalist organization was vague and unclear on what exactly they defined as “hate speech,” choosing to describe the phenomenon as “any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factor.” So I ask you this. If the United Nations doesn’t consider itself the dictator of the New World Order (NWO), why then are they writing an agreement they expect everry country to sign off on? For a very long time, I thought the info I was reading about the United Nations working toward a NWO was a conspiracy theory. Not being a conspiracy theorist, I did massive research. I am a believer now. If you doubt it, I respect your opinion while inviting you to do your own research before you discard it. Let’s talk about the biggest obstacle the NWO players, globalists, "deep state", Soros, and the UN must overcome: Their obstacle is the President of the United States, Donald Trump. Who do you really believe is behind the impeachment attempts, the smear campaigns, and the attempt to convince us that our President has no place in society? Who really is the most complicit in trying to overthrow our government? They (who are they?) attempted to deny us of our right to a fair election and failed. Who is behind Jerry Nadler’s impeachment efforts? Alynskys Rules for Radicals is nothing more than a tactical psyops plan for putting socialism and communism into place. These are Alynsky’s eight rules:
Every one of these "rules for radicals" are in play right now in America. The leaders of the left must disarm and polarize us in order to win. Obama played a huge part by picking and choosing which laws to uphold, letting the Ferguson riots destroy public and private party to create civil disobedience, put in place liberal judges at all levels to rewrrite our Constitution by dismantling laws to enable civil unrest and render conservative values useless. I am proudly a nationalist. As a nationalist, I put the people in my country first. These people are not residents, but American citizens - and yes, that includes (legal) immigrants. We are ONE PEOPLE. It is no different than putting immediate family’s needs before that of extended family, friends, and neighbors. As an American nationalist: I do not support supremacists. I do not support terrorists, whoever they may be. I do not support murder of innocents. Yet, the media wants to convince us that if we are nationalists, we support, and engage in, murder and mayhem. People who love their country don't murder its citizens - we help them! Thank you, Patriot Sheila ~~LJS Trinity Discussions of "Sensible Gun Legislation" cannot happen when people DO NOT UNDERSTAND GUNS, LAWS, RIGHTS. First, let's talk about the failures of existing background checks because there are those claiming Universal Background Checks (UBC) and RED FLAG LAWS are solutions. They are not, with the existing system and laws in place.
1. The existing background check system is a FAILURE. The FBI is tasked to perform them. There have been mistakes made, bad/ crazy/ aggressive behavior has been overlooked, and the FBI even gave the responsibility to a third party claiming budget cuts. 2. There is NOT a clear, strong, standard practice across ALL law enforcement, because states, organizations, school systems, localities, entities make non-reporting rules due to political correctness (PC), privacy laws, and/or funding desires. 3. Existing privacy laws WILL NOT ALLOW THE REPORTING of mental health matters. And, frankly, insane people aren't going to sign a form saying, 'Why yes, please look into my background of erractic and dangerous behavior/s." 4. "RED FLAGS" are not clearly defined. Neither are they attached to all cases, as was the shame of Broward County, because of a systemic cover up of juvenile crimes for funding, and awards for lower crime rates among teens. 5. Systemic flaws and abuse of the system happen when localities use political correctness to turn blind eye against aggressors due to "_____". (ie - Fort Hood, PULSE, San Bernardino) To take serious action, and for any law abiding citizen to be willing to give up MORE OF THEIR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS, open honest discussion must be made. It is impossible to believe that RED FLAG laws will NOT BE abused. Look at the existing failures already listed. Why would any sane person want to add another variable? "Due process" is a cornerstone of the American justice system, yet, there are those who side step it. Logically, red flag laws sound like a good idea. Now, remember how badly existing laws and systems are being abused, institutions are being weaponized against citizens, and FBI guidelines are not being followed... Sane people will not accept another slippery slope. Into the discussion must be the other MANY contributing factors to the violence. Here are a few: FBI Background System failure, media, Hollywood promoting violence, extreme privacy laws, decline of the American Way of life, and lack of Mental Health Care. UBC Staff MUST BE law enforcement who have taken "oath to serve & protect", understand "due process", and are trained, caring, non-biased, non-political personnel which work with interconnected agencies. It MUST NOT BE FARMED OUT to 3rd party pencil pushers due to budget costs, as has ALREADY HAPPENED. Awareness to spot and address mental health issues can only be done in caring, strong, civil communities. It is the only way to stop the scourge of violence. We must stop being pawns in a political game while ignoring the FACT that the UN Agenda and it's supporters want no guns. It is naive to not understand it is part of Agenda 21 and 30 's Sustainable Development Goals. We must not settle for a political band aid that is merely another step to eradicate rights. ~~LJS TRINITY Wow! With one stroke of a pen California goes from a socialist state to a communist state. How long before the CA state economy becomes a communist economy? Maybe it already has? Ask yourself the following question: Is the state dictating what you can produce, when, where, and how much to sell it for? Before you say no - have any laws been enacted in part for some of the who, what, when, where, and how much? And if the answer is yes to any of those, then you are on your way to communism. According to this unconstitutional new law, CA voters must now choose their President from the "Communist Comrades" pre-approved list. In simpler terms, the state of California has dictated that its residents be servants of the state. Folks, this is what communist and socialist countries do. To be clear, with the action of CA legislature and the stroke of Gov. Newsom's pen, the right to choose their President is being denied to CA voters. Now as yourself these questions: Is it right for a candidate (or anyone) to lose the right to privacy? Is it right that California legislators are not required to display their personal tax returns to voters under this same law? Is it right for any one person to be required to present their tax returns, and it doesn't apply to all of us? There is only one reason why it should, and that is in the case of compelling tax fraud. Otherwise, it is an absolute no -- and, that includes fishing expeditions. Now, a look at the persons of Gavin Newsom and Xavier Becerra Read these two gems on "Comrade" AG Becerra - Becerra's law license expired in CA and was not renewed until 2017. Why? He was part of the plan to move to socialism and ultimately communism. He is so filled with hate because of the way his father and mother and his whole family was treated based upon their ethnicity that it has let his emotion define who he is rather than turn it to constructive thinking. He has labeled the white race, as a whole, racists. That in and of itself makes him an Elite Hispanic supremacist. In doing so, he has made himself as intolerable as the very people who wrongfully inflicted the pain upon him and his family. But IT DOES NOT MAKE EVERY HISPANIC A SUPREMACIST.
Next, is information on "Comrade" Gavin Newsom -
In summary, these two communist spewing comrades' actions reflect simply that neither can be trusted. Immorality comes in many different forms. While none of us are without sin, enacting hypocritical, unconstitutional and un-American laws is unacceptable. - TIME FOR ACTION - Now, there are many fine conservatives in California. Many have or are exiting. There are many that cannot or will not leave for many reasons. Feeling trapped is understandable. Use that feeling to vote them out. Speak up. Patriots will support any effort to help you rid this communist infestation. You are not alone. The forgotten men & women from every state must be involved. It requires the help of every patriot in the nation. We are one election away from becoming a filthy socialist country which always ends with a dirty communist controlled economy. You can believe it now or you can believe it later, after it happens. If later, simply, it will be too late. Globalists, socialists, and communists know that President Trump will continue to prevent this from happening. That is why they, MSM, and activist judges hate him. We need to think forward and beyond President Trump. We can, and will, re-elect President Trump. The final queestion is: What happens after his second term ends? ~~LJS Trinity Thank you to Sheila for compiling and expressing! This is the tweet by Scherie Murray that raises questions for us: Murray has been asked to address the tweet. Seeing it, made her suspect in our minds. We wanted to know more about her as she is being promoted through various outlets and endorsements. We asked her to explain why she felt compelled to send a congratulatory tweet stating, "It's time for new leadership." To us, it appears to be an endorsement for socialism. There is, as yet, no response. So, we started to dig. In researching Murray, who proclaims to be a Republican running to unseat Ocasio-Cortez, the following was found: Tapping the Mediate.com link, this is the response received: Naturally, the next search was "who is mediate". This came up: Guess the media is blocking conservatives, after all, huh? Unreal isn't it!? Putting the seemingly odd tweet above with the idea of Democrats using the #JihadSquad as puppets, perhaps there is more to it. If you have not watched "The Brains Behind AOC Part II" - you need to do so, now. This is the link. Summize it to say, the idea is run a slate of candidates and/ or trojan horses who really support the opposite party. Crazy as it sounds, there is video evidence of the plan included for you to hear it first hand. Understand this, first, there is already a Republican that we feel very comfortable with - @RuthPapazian2020. Adding Murray means there will be a primary.
Second, watching the Cortez puppet in action, the video, and learning more about the Justice Democrats (filthy socialists and future communists) plans, it is more than a possiblity. It is highly possible at this point, they are attempting to infiltrate the Republican party by running their candidates on GOP ticket for federal, state and local elections. This is a Zack Exley, 2017 quote, "let's use the democracy to take over the government." Now, put Murray's tweet together with all this. Are you not also wondering if Murray is the socialists' insurance policy for AOC's loss in the next election? Right now, we do not know the answer to this. ~~LJS Trinity Identity politics... that's what the Democrats have. The #JihadSquad are Congressional Members who are given a "pass" as they trash their oath of office. Congress needs to answer why the four Members of Congress' race baiting/ hateful tweets, speeches, and policies are not deemed unacceptable?! Answer: Lobbyist Money Here are those who is not afraid to speak truth:
Will we get more Members of Congress to stand up for American Values?
It doesn't even matter if people approve whether a "citizenship question" should be on the census, or not. It is a valid, legal question for a census.
First, it's common sense. The Census is to count citizens to distribute funds and representatives appropriately by the resulting numbers. THAT is the crux of why Obama dropped the question. As he, his administration and his policies loaded the country up with refugees and illegal aliens, they encouraged the amassed voting blocks in targeted districts. This organized rollout gave us Representatives Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley, Ocasio-Cortez, and Rashid Tlaib. These newly elected House of Representatives members are considered the Four Freshman of the Democrat Apocalypse. Speaker Pelosi is Speaker of the House in Name Only. Pelosi does what she is told. In her own words in an interview about when she became a member of Congress, she could not stand alone. She, personally, needed more women before she could do things. She is no leader. She does as her lobbyists demand. Therefore, she is "forced" to be subservient to the new leaders of the party, especially Ocasio-Cortez. Second, the Founders called for U. S. Census to count citizens. There is no way that the founders could foresee that Legislators would break their Oath of office en masse to disgrace the Constitution, want non-citizens to have not just "rights" but, treat them better than US CITIZENS who pay the bills via taxes, merely for money, power and to gain Votas! Third, the political football... The Left claims it is the Republicans who are attempting to block "non-whites" from voting, and being represented, via the inclusion of a citizenship question. Ask yourself this: "Which party gains more?" Most people who come legally, love and cherish this country - a country who welcomes them. Most immigrants assimilate and fight for the USA. Most immigrants do not wish to destroy the country who gave them the opportunity to follow the same dreams as their fellow Americans. Instead, it is the Left which intends to utterly annihilate the USA from within, using our freedoms and generosity against us. This is clearly exemplified by the support given to one of their freshman leaders, Rep. Omar. Understand this, the ONLY REASON there's an issue now is because lawmakers are fighting for illegal migrants to have rights because they need "Votas!" Congress must do their job! Stand up for Americans, just as President Trump is doing. And, We The People MUST DEMAND Pelosi #VacateTheChair since she is nothing but a placeholder at this stage of her career. ~~LJS Trinity In a carefully contrived manner, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a cardsharp made her way into the Legislature: - Timed for a midterm election, after a Republican won the White House. - Selecting New York’s 14th District for her candidacy was crucial, as the registered Democrats outnumber Republicans six to 1 (6:1). - Choosing who to run against to make the biggest headlines. The notoriety in beating incumbent Joe Crowley who was slated as Pelosi’s someday replacement made Ocasio-Cortez famous. It also put Pelosi on notice, that those holding the cards were backing the activist. Activist is an accurate term for Congress person Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She was selected, trained, and prepared for the role she is portraying. This is not a small time clip joint. This is a national scale scam. Currently, Representative Ocasio-Cortez is running the table about conditions in immigration determent camps. She compares them to “concentration camps’ and will not back down as to the insulting nature of the statement. Instead she triples down, and others follow her lead. Senior Democrat Leaders don’t shut her and the others down, ignoring the anti-Semitic tone. How does that happen unless it is a pre-meditated shuffling of the cards they want dealt to the public. Responsible people do not banter over technical usage of these specific words unless their goal is to minimize the travesty of what happened to the Jewish people during the Holocaust: Ethnic cleansing and concentration camps are synonymous. The cards are on the felt and laid open for all willing to see the truth. Congressional Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez complains about the conditions migrants are experiencing after their own willful choice to cross into the USA and surrendering to authorities. She calls the overburdened areas “concentration camps” while not voting to fund humanitarian aid and not fixing loopholes in existing laws which are creating the problem. This is her doing, as she is the front person: Pelosi is Speaker of the House in name only. After the initial defamatory use of the term, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez receive rightful backlash. Many have wasted time attempting to correct her misappropriation of the term. Thinking she merely needed to be schooled on the subject so an epiphany would happen, she was offered an invitation to Poland to visit an actual camp designed and responsible for death. She has ignored that request so far. Let is be understood, there is no mistake in the words she chose, as exhibited by the newly shared photos of her crying at the border. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is playing the next cards in her stacked deck. But, there is a joker in the deal. Those photos were taken “a yr ago today” according to the man who took them. According to Ivan Pierre Aguirre’s tweet, he took the photos while Ocasio-Cortez was a candidate on the campaign trail. Yes, it was a photo op. And, the timing… well, you understand now, don’t you? ~~LJS Trinity Prepared by J Juan Williams responds to Jesse Watter's discussion topic about President Trump's "dirt" comments in the Oval Office. Shockingly, Williams unintentionally calls the scandal of harassing US Citizens through a governmental agency due to political bias, and the murder of four Americans in Benghazi as "PIMPLES" when compared to Trump's actions. How dare #PimpleJuan speak of fellow Americans this way?Just because he cannot admit Obama's administration was full of highly criminal scandals, he disrespects the fallen. Absolutely shameful behavior.
IF he sincerely misspoke, he needs to own it, and apologize. Patriots will never forget the Benghazi4. ~~LJS Trinity |
LJS TrinityWe are for the duly elected President, the Constitution, LEOs, and work to unite America. Archives
December 2019
Categories |